“They created a system
where it was virtually impossible to ever catch anyone cheating, removed all
verification processes, automatically registered all drivers license
holders—whether they like it or not, and then launched that program immediately
after granting every one of the untold millions of illegal aliens in
California a driver's license.” – Tim Donnelly, former California State
Assemblyman
Per the highly respected and
nonpartisan Pew
Center, 11.1 (or is it 30?)
million illegal aliens live within America's porous borders. Of this human
tsunami, one in five illegal
aliens reside in two metropolitan areas, either Los Angeles or New York City.
Per their latest data, that translates into 2.2 million people.
Using simple math, we'll
assume half of them reside in LA. To flush out the political
landscape there, per a 2015 California Political Review poll, 13%
admit to illegal voting. Also shown in that study is that 80 percent—or
four of five illegal voters—cast
ballots for Democrats. (As California is home to one-third
of all welfare
recipients, Democrats pushing cradle-to-grave
dependence is unfortunately a natural fit.) Therefore, just in California,
that means 114,400 fraudulent votes for Hillary Clinton in the 2016
election. (Hypothetically, double that result to include NYC.) Still, how
ever it was achieved, with 60 percent of the popular vote, it's no surprise Crooked
Hillary won there!
With 55 electoral votes—of
the vital 270 needed—California remains a major player in
choosing a new U.S. president. Is the Golden State—America's largest by
population—actually a tarnished and seedy microcosm of voting corruption?
Specifically, I refer to population dense, Democrat-controlled
urban centers that delivered Hillary victories. For example, the regular cycle
of dead
people voting in Chicago
readily comes to mind. Of this wrongdoing, expert J. Christian Adams—a former
election attorney for the Department of Justice—told Fox and Friends
last October:
“Dead people are voting and
it’s something this [Obama's] administration does not want to do anything
about. They must like it. They must like who they are voting for… Now we have
four million, four million Steve, ineligible and dead voters on
American voter rolls according to the Pew
Charitable Trust.”
This is a fundamental threat
to the very foundation of our democracy. An ever-present iceberg to the Titanic
that is the good ship America. Let's be clear: election fraud is election
stealing. Yet, on both
sides of the aisle, obtuse establishment
politicians blithely pretend this systemic problem is nonexistent.
No wonder this finite reality so difficult to gauge! Finding accurate
information is as tedious as counting grains of sand on one of California's
beaches.
To go down Alice's
rabbit hole further, obstructionist
Democrats now call for “Calexit” due to the election of Donald
Trump. Apparently, one
in three Californians polled support the split. (Are they same one-third
receiving those welfare payments?) In any case, California is making belligerent
noises like South Carolina of 1860 (when it seceded from the Union over the
election of Abraham
Lincoln). In that rebellious
spirit, officials grumble about not remitting legally obligated tax dollars
to the federal government. Likewise, they insanely contemplate mutating sanctuary
cities into one lawless state. Does Jerry Brown (a.k.a. “Governor
Moonbeam”) envision Westworld debauchery as a real-life template?
Still, the most immediate
“California problem” actually emanates from Washington State's Ninth Circuit of
Appeals. Helmed by three loony lefties, their decisions are overturned 80
percent of the time. Essentially, this activist triumvirate ruled that
foreigners' travel plans should not be inconvenienced by Trump's executive
order (read: a 90-day moratorium regarding seven terrorist-infested
countries with no trustworthy government to vouch for them). It doesn't matters
to them that the President's action is expressly supported by federal law,
1952's Immigration and Nationality Act, Section
212(f), which specifies:
“Whenever the
President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the
United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he
may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend
the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants,
or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be
appropriate.”
Thus, this kangaroo court
radically overstepped its bounds; thumbing its nose at all concerned.
Three Ninth Circuit judges
means three major legal errors. As described above, they encroached on the
co-equal executive branch of government (read: Article II, section 1 of the
U.S. Constitution). Second, they granted non-citizens—with no constitutional
right to live here—legal standing where none exists. Then, they compounded that
mistake by gifting foreigners preferential treatment over the legitimate
safety concerns of American citizens.
The President's duty is
preserve our country's sovereignty. That means enforcing law to ensure the
American people are protected. Therefore, in practice, Trump determines the
conditions by which non-citizens can enter, leave or otherwise reside within
our borders. After all,
lives are at stake!
Progressive
ideologues—whether politicians or judges—should not be playing chicken with
our collective fate. Specifically, Trump's constitutional authority should not
be usurped by this rogues'
gallery extending from Washington's Ninth Circuit to California's state
house. In this situation, the former pretends to be “beyond reproach.” Yet,
unlike King
Solomon, they cut the baby in half with their mangled
misinterpretation of the equal
protection clause. The fact remains: citizens' rights can't be
countermanded by non-citizens' needs. (Likewise, one state's rambunctious
desire for independence cannot prevail over the national interest in unity.)
Therefore, Washington State's reckless
ban block—like California's antebellum fantasy—demonstrate how badly out of
step they are with the rest of us.
Twitter: @DavidHunterblog
http://patriotpost.us/commentators/446
http://www.americanthinker.com/author/david_l_hunter/
http://canadafreepress.com/members/74987/DavidLHunter/976
http://newstex.aci.info/authors/15977720f5100100002
