“You can call us wrong, but don't call us weasels. We are not weasels.” – FBI Director
James Comey at a congressional hearing on September 28, 2016
Sigmund Freud would have a field day with Mr.
Comey's psyche. Dr. Freud would say he protests too much. Why does the FBI
Director compare himself—and the now perhaps forever tarnished organization he
heads—to a pack of weasels? Guilty subconsciousness perhaps, Herr Doctor?
Recall, the FBI's motto is Fidelity, Bravery and
Integrity. Once important American ideals, today reduced to a bumper sticker
slogan. Consider the bureau's former principled reputation of incorruptibility:
of holding the powerful to account without fear or favor. Men like Eliot
“untouchable” Ness who risked life and limb to combat criminally rather than
condone it as James Comey clearly has. How else does one explain his actions of
last January, of laying out an unambiguous case of multifaceted Clintonian law
breaking, only to ultimately sit on his hands and close the investigations?
To add insult to injury, Mr. Comey foolishly took
the political heat for his public pronouncements. Yet, the fix was in before
that. Specifically, when spouse Bill Clinton had an “unplanned” chinwag with
Attorney General Lynch. Both in different private planes which by “sheer
coincidence” crossed paths on the same tarmac in Phoenix. So the nation's top
prosecutor meeting privately with the spouse (an ex-president) whose wife is
the prime subject of a then looming criminal indictment isn't a colossal
conflict of interest? Moreover, is it any surprise that just days after that infamous
meeting AG Lynch announced that Hillary would face no criminal charges?
So, one supposes during their 20 to 25 minute
exchange, Mrs. Lynch and Mr. Clinton only chitchatted about the grand kids as
was claimed? Seriously? That's the same malarkey as Mrs. Clinton's yoga routines
and Chelsea's wedding plans that she claimed populated her private servers.
Those unsecured, illegal devices likely hacked by bad actors in which Mr. Comey
stated 110
emails were classified—and 48,000 (read: 33,000 originally reported
and an additional
15,000 recently uncovered) were destroyed.
By ignoring the law—and the evidence—Mr. Comey
wrongly recommended non-prosecution. He laughable claimed he didn't want to
interfere in the upcoming election, but he has done precisely that—and not on
the side of the angels. How is any presidential candidate known by reputation
to be a habitual
liar—an immoral and greedy person mired in 40
years of infamy—good for the country? If the email scandal wasn't
malfeasance enough, there is the Clinton Foundation “charity”: a pay-for-play
scheme involving high-level political favors in exchange a personal Clinton
slush fund (while Mrs. Clinton was Secretary of State). The 238
million the Clintons have “earned” after being “dead
broke” 15 years ago doesn't even factor in the 2
billion dollar foundation they control. By his own Freudian omission, Mr.
Comey's a weasel, but the crooked Clintons are far worse: unapologetic rats who
make Richard “Watergate”
Nixon look, by comparison, like a church mouse.
Experience repeatedly demonstrates that honesty and
the 'for sale' Clintons have never coincided. They should be on the verge of
the big
house, not the White House. What on earth is going on here? How can the
superficial irrelevancy of identity
politics—this time in the trivial form of an empty
skirt by a corrupt wearer—obscure this obvious truth? One wonders, is this
propagandist Germany of 1933 or freedom-loving America of 2016? How can such an
ignoble character enjoy such mindless support—and have a 50/50 shot at becoming
the next U.S. president?
In any case, Mr. Nixon was drummed out of the
nation's highest office for his law breaking. He certain didn't go in the door
dogged by a well-established track record of villainy as Hillary
Clinton hopes to. That, too, is a vital distinction. Yet, the Mrs. Pig Pen
of American politics has only one unpredictable barrier to overcome if she can:
outsider Donald
Trump.
In the final analysis, political power without a
guiding morality—and/or respect for law—is inherently corrupt. This dynamic
encapsulates the disastrous
Obama years (soon mercifully to be in the rear view mirror), James
Comey's “weaselly” words of last week, and the titanic mistake of electing
another corrupt Clinton to the Oval Office in November.
Twitter: @DavidHunterblog
http://patriotpost.us/commentators/446
http://www.americanthinker.com/author/david_l_hunter/
http://canadafreepress.com/members/74987/DavidLHunter/976
Twitter: @DavidHunterblog
http://patriotpost.us/commentators/446
http://www.americanthinker.com/author/david_l_hunter/
http://canadafreepress.com/members/74987/DavidLHunter/976
No comments:
Post a Comment